March 19, 2025|6 min reading

GPT 4.5 vs Claude 3.7: A Comprehensive Comparison

GPT 4.5 vs Claude 3.7: A Comprehensive Comparison for AI Enthusiasts
Author Merlio

published by

@Merlio

Don't Miss This Free AI!

Unlock hidden features and discover how to revolutionize your experience with AI.

Only for those who want to stay ahead.

AI technology is advancing at an incredible pace, and with OpenAI's release of GPT 4.5, the stakes are higher than ever. In this blog, we’ll dive deep into GPT 4.5, explore its new capabilities, and compare it to Claude 3.7. Let’s break down the performance, price, and potential use cases to see which AI model comes out on top.

What’s the Big Deal with GPT-4.5?

GPT 4.5, known as Orion, is OpenAI’s most powerful model yet, building on the strengths of its predecessor, GPT-4. With improvements across the board, GPT 4.5 introduces cutting-edge features in natural language processing and multilingual communication. By scaling up to 12.8 trillion parameters, a 60% increase over GPT-4, and utilizing 128 dynamic expert networks, this model offers unmatched pattern recognition and creative connections.

In early tests, GPT 4.5 has demonstrated a remarkable reduction in hallucinations and a significant boost in scientific accuracy. While it still has some room for improvement in math and coding tasks, it shines in conversational capabilities, making it ideal for a variety of applications.

Benchmarks That Speak Volumes

Let's take a closer look at some of the key benchmarks that define GPT 4.5’s performance:

  • Science & Factual Accuracy: GPT 4.5 scores 71.4% on the GPQA, a significant improvement from GPT-4's 53.6%. This makes it much more reliable when dealing with factual queries.
  • Mathematics: On the AIME '24 benchmark, GPT 4.5 scores 36.7%, a notable improvement from GPT-4's 9.3%. However, it still lags behind specialized models.
  • Multilingual Proficiency: With a score of 85.1% on the MMMLU benchmark, GPT 4.5 proves its ability to handle a variety of languages effectively.
  • Coding Performance: GPT 4.5 shows progress in coding tasks, with a score of 38.0% on SWE-Bench, but it still lags behind competitors like Claude 3.7 in this area.

The Price of Brilliance

Of course, such powerful technology comes at a cost. GPT 4.5 is priced at $75 per million input tokens and $150 per million output tokens, with a monthly subscription for ChatGPT Pro costing $200. While these prices may be steep, the value it brings in terms of creativity, emotional intelligence, and general conversational skills may justify the cost for many users.

Use Cases That Hit Home

GPT 4.5 excels in scenarios where human-like interaction is key. Some common use cases include:

  • Emotional Support & Coaching: With its emotionally tuned responses, GPT 4.5 can offer advice and guidance, making it ideal for virtual therapy and personal coaching.
  • Creative Collaboration: Whether you're brainstorming ideas for a project or refining your writing, GPT 4.5 can spark creativity and help you craft compelling content.
  • Document Synthesis: Need to compile information from various sources? GPT 4.5 can summarize and synthesize content seamlessly.
  • Agentic Task Automation: Automating multi-step workflows or data summarization becomes easier with GPT 4.5.

A Platform That Brings It All Together

For those who frequently jump between different AI tools, platforms like Merlio offer an all-in-one solution. Merlio provides access to hundreds of AI models in a single platform, saving time and effort while allowing for seamless integration of tools like GPT 4.5. This makes it easier than ever to experiment, deploy, and scale AI applications.

How Does GPT 4.5 Stack Up Against Claude 3.7 Sonnet?

When compared to other AI models, GPT 4.5 holds its ground in natural conversation and creativity but falls short in areas like coding and technical math:

  • Claude 3.7 Sonnet: While Claude excels at structured reasoning and coding, GPT 4.5 stands out in emotional intelligence and conversational flow.
  • Google’s Gemini Ultra 2.0: Gemini offers fantastic multimodal capabilities, but GPT 4.5’s broader knowledge base and conversational fluidity give it an edge in everyday use.
  • Reasoning Models (o1/o3-mini): For tasks requiring complex math and deep reasoning, specialized models outperform GPT 4.5.

The Road Ahead

As OpenAI continues to refine GPT 4.5, there are whispers of future hybrid models that may combine the best of GPT’s conversational abilities with the precision of specialized reasoning models. For now, GPT 4.5 is available to ChatGPT Pro users and select enterprise customers, with broader access anticipated in the future.

Final Thoughts

GPT 4.5 is an impressive leap forward in AI’s conversational capabilities. While it may not excel at math or coding, it’s a fantastic tool for anyone looking for an AI that understands emotional nuance and can engage in creative, natural dialogue. If you're looking for a model to help brainstorm, write, or simply have a thoughtful conversation, GPT 4.5 might be the perfect fit.

If you're looking to explore a variety of AI models in one place, consider checking out Merlio, where you can access a range of AI tools without the hassle of switching between platforms.

FAQ

Q1: Is GPT 4.5 better than Claude 3.7 Sonnet? A1: GPT 4.5 excels in conversational abilities and emotional intelligence, while Claude 3.7 Sonnet performs better in technical reasoning and coding tasks.

Q2: What are the use cases for GPT 4.5? A2: GPT 4.5 is great for emotional support, creative collaboration, document synthesis, and automating tasks.

Q3: How much does GPT 4.5 cost? A3: GPT 4.5 costs $75 per million input tokens and $150 per million output tokens, with ChatGPT Pro available for $200 per month.

Q4: Can GPT 4.5 handle multiple languages? A4: Yes, GPT 4.5 performs exceptionally well with multilingual tasks, scoring 85.1% on the MMMLU benchmark.

Q5: Is GPT 4.5 worth the price? A5: While it is costly, GPT 4.5’s ability to engage in natural conversation, offer emotional support, and assist with creative tasks makes it worth the investment for many users.